back to blog roll

The performance period for Medicare’s Merit-based Incentive Payment System 2026 reporting year runs from January 1 through December 31, 2026.

Performance during this period will directly impact Medicare Part B payments under the Physician Fee Schedule in the 2028 payment year.

A clinician or group’s final MIPS score determines whether they receive a negative, neutral, or positive payment adjustment. These adjustments apply to professional services billed under the Physician Fee Schedule and do not affect facility payments (e.g., services provided in hospital outpatient departments or ambulatory surgical centers).

This blog posts summarizes key updates to MIPS for 2026 and outlines practical considerations for clinicians and programs participating in the Quality Payment Program. For an update on Quality in wound care see topic "Quality in Wound Care".

What is MIPS ?

The Quality Payment Program is a CMS program established by law to shift Medicare reimbursement toward value and outcomes. Clinicians participate through one of two tracks:

  • Merit-based Incentive Payment System
  • Advanced Alternative Payment Models (Advanced APMs). For more information on APMs visit the QPP website.

Under MIPS, eligible clinicians report performance data across multiple categories:

  • Quality
  • Promoting Interoperability (if applicable)
  • Improvement Activities

CMS calculates performance for the Cost category based on claims data.

Each clinician or group receives a final score from 0 to 100, which is compared to a performance threshold.

  • Scores above the threshold may receive a positive payment adjustment
  • Scores below the threshold may receive a negative adjustment (penalty) of up to 9%

Some MIPS categories require data to be collected throughout the entire year of 2026.

However, if you have not started collecting data for 2026 yet, it is not too late to start now. Submitting some data is better than submitting no data.

How has MIPS evolved over the past years? 

Box 1 below summarizes key updates since 2017. 

Box 1. Key updates in MIPS since 2017

The Quality Payment Program has evolved significantly since its 2017 “pick your pace” introduction, moving toward a more structured, value-based framework. Recent updates (2024–2026) emphasize program stability, greater adoption of MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs), increased performance expectations, and a continued shift toward digital quality measurement.

Key changes over the past 3–5 years include:

  • Expansion of MVPs: CMS is progressively expanding MIPS Value Pathways as a more streamlined alternative to traditional MIPS, aligning measures around specialties and conditions.
  • Higher performance expectations: The performance threshold has increased to 75 points in recent years, making it more challenging to avoid negative payment adjustments of up to 9%.
  • Greater emphasis on cost: The cost category now accounts for approximately 30% of the total score, reinforcing CMS’s focus on total cost of care.
  • Advanced APM updates: The 5% incentive for Advanced APM participation ended after the 2024 performance year, while CMS continues to standardize reporting through the APP Plus measure set.
  • Digital transformation: CMS is advancing the use of eCQMs and digital quality measures (dQMs), aiming to enable more automated, interoperable reporting over time.

Current structure (2025–2026):

  • MIPS (Traditional and MVP): Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, Promoting Interoperability
  • Advanced APMs: Focus on high-quality, high-value care with financial risk and alternative payment structures

What's new with MIPS in 2026? 

CMS has taken a measured approach for 2026, emphasizing stability while continuing the gradual evolution of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System toward more clinically aligned reporting through MIPS Value Pathways. Box 2 summarizes main 2026 Policy Changes for the Quality Payment Program.

Box 2. Summary of 2026 Policy Changes for the Quality Payment Program

Program Stability Continues

  • The performance threshold remains at 75 points through the 2028 performance year
  • CMS continues to prioritize consistency and predictability for clinicians and organizations

Ongoing Shift Toward MVPs

  • Total of 27 available MVPs. 6 new MVPs introduced (including radiology, pathology, podiatry, and vascular surgery)
  • All existing MVPs updated to reflect current measure inventories
  • Multispecialty small practices can still report as a group, with subgroup reporting remaining optional

Updates Across Performance Categories

Quality

  • 5 new measures added, 30 measures updated, 10 measures removed
  • Continued alignment with the APP Plus measure set for APM participants

Cost

  • New cost measures will undergo a 2-year informational-only period, allowing clinicians to review performance before impacting scores

Improvement Activities

  • 3 new activities added, 7 modified, 8 removed

Promoting Interoperability

  • New measure suppression policy established
  • Continued flexibility, including suppression of certain measures (e.g., electronic case reporting in current cycles)

Advanced APM Updates

  • CMS will now determine Qualifying APM Participant (QP) status at the individual level, in addition to the APM entity level
  • Simplified calculations using covered professional services

ACO (Shared Savings Program) Changes

  • Revised beneficiary definitions to reduce reporting burden and improve alignment between:
    • Assigned patients
    • Patients included in quality reporting

How does MIPS affect payments to eligible clinicians? 

If you are required to participate in MIPS, you will earn a performance-based payment adjustment - up, down, or not at all - based on the 2026 data that you submit (or do not submit) by March 2027. Your Medicare Part B-covered professional services beginning on January 1, 2028. will be affected.

Your MIPS final score will determine whether you receive a negative, neutral, or positive MIPS payment adjustment. The 2026 MIPS payment adjustments vary between -9% and +9%. 

Table 1 below outlines how final scores relate to the size of your MIPS payment adjustment with a performance threshold of 75 points. The final score ranges will change if and when the performance threshold is updated through rulemaking.

Table 1. Final scores and MIPS payment adjustment with a performance threshold of 75 points

Final ScoreMIPS Payment Adjustment PercentageDescription
0.00 – 18.75 points-9%Maximum negative adjustment, as required by law
18.76 – 74.99 points-9% < 0%Negative adjustment on a sliding scale between negative 9 percent and zero percent
75.00 points (performance threshold)0%“Neutral” adjustment. No increase or decrease to reimbursement rate
75.01 – 100.00 points> 0%Positive adjustment. Subject to a “scaling factor” to preserve budget neutrality

See CMS 2026 Quality Benchmarks User Guide with Scoring Examples.

In the 2026 MIPS, to avoid a payment penalty, eligible clinicians have to score a total of at least 75 overall MIPS points

How do I know if I am required to participate in MIPS? 

Clinicians listed in table 2 who bill Medicare through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and meet certain criteria are required to participate:

Table 2. MIPS 2026 - Eligible Clinician Types
  • Physicians (including doctors of medicine, osteopathy, dental surgery, dental medicine, podiatric medicine, and optometry)
  • Osteopathic practitioners
  • Chiropractors
  • Physician assistants
  • Nurse practitioners
  • Clinical nurse specialists
  • Certified registered nurse anesthetists
  • Physical therapists
  • Occupational therapists
  • Clinical psychologists
  • Qualified speech-language pathologists
  • Qualified audiologists
  • Registered dietitians or nutrition professionals
  • Clinical social workers
  • Certified nurse midwives

For eligible clinician types above, the quickest way to find out if a clinician meets participation criteria is by looking him/her up on the QPP Participation Status Tool. 

  • You will need your National Provider Identifier (NPI) and Associated Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs). When you reassign your Medicare billing rights to a TIN (e.g., TIN that belongs to a hospital or practice), your NPI becomes associated with that TIN. This association is referred to as a TIN/NPI combination. 
  • If the provider is required to participate, determine if provider is considered “Facility-based”. Medicare's goal for measuring performance at the facility level is to reduce reporting burden for MIPS eligible clinicians who are facility-based.
  • For more information about eligibility: Review the CMS QPP website.

How can I report for MIPS 2026? 

There are three MIPS reporting frameworks available to MIPS eligible clinicians:

  • Traditional MIPS, established in the first year of the Quality Payment Program, is the original framework for reporting to MIPS. You select the quality measures and improvement activities, in addition to the complete Promoting Interoperability measure set, that you will collect and report. Medicare collects and calculates data for the Cost performance category for you.
  • The Alternative Payment Model (APM) Performance Pathway, or APP, is a streamlined reporting framework for clinicians who participate in a MIPS APM. The APP is designed to reduce reporting burden, create new scoring opportunities for participants in MIPS APMs, and encourage participation in APMs. The available quality measures might not offer relevant overlap with wound care practices.
    • If you are in a Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program) Accountable Care Organization (ACO), your ACO will report quality data on your behalf. Shared Savings Program ACOs are required to report to APP Plus quality measure set.
  • MIPS Value Pathways, or MVPs, are the newest way to fulfill MIPS reporting requirements. MVPs include a subset of measures and activities that are related to a given specialty or medical condition. MVPs offer reduced reporting requirements, allowing MVP participants to report on a smaller, more cohesive subset of measures and activities (within the measures and activities available for traditional MIPS).
    • For the 2026 performance year, 27 MVPs are available. For wound care programs, the set "Value in Primary Care", “Podiatry”, and “Vascular Surgery” offer some measures that might overlap with their practice, however the available quality measures might not be relevant enough to meet the requirement to report 4 quality measures from the list provided in this MVP set. Examples of quality measures available in this set are:  
      • Quality ID #47 (CBE 0326): Advance Care Plan
      • Quality ID #487: Screening for Social Drivers of Health
      • Quality ID #483 (CBE 3568): Person-Centered Primary Care Measure Patient Reported Outcome
    • Check each MVP and identify QMs that may be pertinent to your wound care practice

CMS will sunset traditional MIPS through future rulemaking, at which point the MVP reporting option will become mandatory unless the clinician is eligible to report the APP.

How can I participate in MIPS 2026? 

"Participation options" refers to the levels at which data can be collected and submitted, or "reported", to CMS for MIPS.

There are 5 participation option for MIPS eligible clinicians: 1. as an individual, 2. group, 3. virtual group, 4. as an alternative payment model (APM) Entity or 5. Subgroup.

  • 1. Individual: To participate as an individual, clinician needs to:
    • Be identified as a MIPS eligible clinician type on Medicare Part B claims, (see Table 1),
    • Have enrolled as a Medicare provider before 2026, 
    • Not be a Qualifying Alternative Payment Model Participant (QP), AND
    • Exceed the low volume threshold as an individual
      • What is the low volume threshold? Medicare looks at your Medicare claims from two 12-month segments, referred to as the MIPS determination period, to assess the volume of care you provide to Medicare beneficiaries. Data from the first segment is released as preliminary eligibility. Data from the second segment is reconciled with the first segment and released as the final eligibility determination.
        • The two 12-month segments for MIPS 2026 are: October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025 and October 1, 2025 to September 30, 2026. Medicare will release final (reconciled) data from the 2 segments in December 2026.  Medicare will notify you when your new eligibility information is posted on the QPP Participation Status Lookup Tool
      • Clinicians are required to participate in MIPS if, in both 12-month segments, you:
        • Bill more than $90,000 for Part B covered professional services/ segment AND
        • See more than 200 Part B patients/ segment AND
        • Provide 200 or more covered professional services to Part B patients.
      • If you start billing Medicare Part B claims under a practice’s TIN during segment 2, your eligibility at that practice will be based solely on the results from segment 2.
  • If you’re not required to participate as an individual, you may still be required to participate (and receive a payment adjustment) if:
    • Your practice chooses to participate as a group
    • You are part of an approved virtual group
    • You participate in a type of APM called a MIPS APM
  • 2. Group: Collect and submit data for all clinicians in the group.
  • 3. Virtual Group: Collect and submit data for the clinicians in several groups, through a CMS-approved virtual group (traditional MIPS only). A formal election is required.
  • 4. Alternative Payment Model (APM) Entity: Collect and submit data for the clinicians identified as participating in the MIPS APM.
  • 5. SubgroupCollect and submit data for a subset of clinicians in the group. This participation option is only available to clinicians reporting an MVP. Advance registration is required.

How do I get started?

Follow this MIPS 2026 Key Steps and Timeline:

  1. Determine eligibility for QPP (Now): Check if you are required to participate by using the QPP Participation Status Tool.
  2. If participation is required, determine if you’re participating in MIPS as an individual, group, virtual group, and/or APM Entity (Now)
  3. Choose your reporting pathway: Determine whether you will report through Traditional MIPS, an MIPS Value Pathways, or participate through an APM (if applicable).
  4. Understand Thresholds: The performance threshold remains at 75 points.
  5. Collect performance data (2026):
    1. Quality is typically reported over the full calendar year (Jan 1–Dec 31) for optimal scoring
    2. Promoting Interoperability and Improvement Activities generally require a minimum of 90 consecutive days
    3. Cost data is calculated by CMS based on claims
  6. Performance categories:
    1. Traditional MIPS & MVP: Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, Promoting Interoperability
    2. MIPS APM participants are scored under MIPS, often receiving full credit for Improvement Activities
  7. Monitor eligibility: Review your participation status periodically throughout the year
  8. Submit data: Submit performance data (directly or via a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) or Qualified Registry between January and March 2027
  9. Review feedback: Performance feedback becomes available in mid-2027
  10. Preview public reporting: Late 2027 to early 2028
  11. Payment adjustments applied: Throughout 2028

Table 3. Summary of traditional MIPS 2026 - categories, submission requirements and collection period  

NOTE: to visualize columns on the right, scroll down to the bottom of the table and slide it to the right


QualityPromoting InteroperabilityImprovement ActivitiesCost
Percentage of total score30%*25%*15%*30%*
General submission requirements

Submit collected data for at least 6 measures, or a complete specialty measure set; and

  • One of these measures should be an outcome measure (or another high priority measure)
  • You’ll need to report performance data for at least 75% of the patients who qualify for each measure (data completeness).

For Performance Year 2026, you’re required to use an Electronic Health Record (EHR) that meets the certification criteria at 45 CFR 170.315.

Promoting Interoperability performance category measures are organized under 5 objectives - electronic prescribing, health information exchange, provider to patient exchange, public health and clinical data exchange, protect patient health information. In addition to submitting measures, clinicians must

  • Provide your EHR’s CMS identification code from the Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL) and submit a “yes” to:
    • The Actions to Limit or Restrict Compatibility or Interoperability of CEHRT (previously named the Prevention of Information Blocking) Attestation.
    • The ONC Direct Review Attestation.
    • The Security Risk Analysis Measure.
    • The Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) Guides Measure 
    • Submit numerators/denominators (report at least a “1” in the numerator) or report “Yes” as appropriate for all required measures
    • Submit your level of active engagement for the required measures under the Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange objective.

Participants must submit one of the following combinations of activities (each activity must be performed for 90 continuous days or more during 2026)

  • Those with the small practice, rural, non-patient facing, or health professional shortage area special status must attest (submit a “yes”) to 1 activity.
  • All others must attest (submit a “yes”) to 2 activities.
There are 35 cost measures available for Performance Year 2026. 

CMS uses Medicare administrative claims data to calculate cost measure performance, which means clinicians, groups, and virtual groups don’t have to submit any data for this performance category.

Collection period
12-month performance period (January 1 - December 31, 2026)
For 180 continuous days or more during 2026
For 90 continuous days or more during 2026
n/a
Data submission methods
  • You (Individual, Group, Virtual Group, Subgroup, or APM Entity Representative)
    • Medicare Part B claims (small practices only)
    • Sign in to the QPP website and upload (eCQMs and MIPS CQMs)
  • Third-party intermediaries (QCDRs, Qualified Registries, and Health IT Vendors)
    • Sign in to the QPP website and upload (eCQMs, MIPS CQMs and QCDR Measures)
    • Direct submission via Application Programming Interface (API)
  • CMS-Approved Survey Vendors: CAHPS for MIPS Survey Measure
  • Sign in and attest
  • Sign in and upload
  • Direct submission via API
  • Sign in and attest
  • Sign in and upload
  • Direct submission via API
There is no data submission requirement for the Cost performance category. Cost measures are evaluated automatically through administrative claims data.

* This percentage can change due to Exception Applications or Alternative Payment Model (APM) Entity participation. 

There is a “non-pressure ulcer” cost measure under development by CMS, which will be directly relevant to wound care eligible clinicians.

How can WoundReference help eligible clinicians and groups perform well in MIPS? 

  • Quality category: WoundReference provides clinical algorithms/pathways that naturally highlight quality measures that clinicians can more easily meet in wound clinics. By following the algorithms and protocols, not only clinicians can perform well in the MIPS Quality category, but will also practice evidence-based wound care.
  • Cost category: WoundReference’s content and tools are designed with cost-effectiveness in mind. Tools such as the Formulary Module enable clinics to smoothly set up a local wound dressings formulary and save in inventory/supply costs. Another example is the TeleVisit Tool 2.0, which allows efficient use of time for clinicians and patients. 
  • Improvement Activities category: And last but not least, by using WoundReference’s decision support protocols and tools eligible clinicians and groups can easily meet the number of measures required in the Improvement Activities category. See topic "MIPS in Wound Care and Hyperbaric Medicine - Improvement Activities".

More topics on MIPS will be published soon. To find out more about how WoundReference can help clinicians perform well in MIPS, contact us

About the Authors

Elaine Horibe Song, MD, PhD, MBA
Dr. Song is a Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of WoundReference, Inc., a clinical and reimbursement decision support & telemedicine platform for wound care and hyperbaric clinicians. With a medical, science and business background, Dr. Song previously served as medical director for a regenerative medicine-focused biotech company in California, and for a Joint Commission International-accredited hospital network. Dr. Song also served as a management consultant for Kaiser Permanente, practiced as a plastic surgeon in private practice and academia, and conducted bench and clinical research in wound healing, microsurgery and transplant immunology. Dr. Song holds a position as Affiliate Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, and is a volunteer Communication/Website Committee, Association for the Advancement of Wound Care. She has authored more than 200 scientific publications, book chapters, software registrations and patents.
Jeff Mize, RRT, CHT, UHMSADS
With over four decades of healthcare experience, Jeff currently holds the position of Principal Partner at Midwest Hyperbaric LLC and the Co-founder and Chief Clinical Officer of Wound Reference. Jeff has excelled in critical care throughout his career, devoting almost a decade as a Flight Respiratory Therapist/Paramedic for the Spirit of Kansas City Life Flight. In 1993, Jeff transitioned into the field of Hyperbaric Medicine and Wound Care, where he committed 21 years of his career to serving as the Program Director for a 24/7 Level 1 UHMS Accredited facility with Distinction. In this role, he continued to provide patient care while overseeing all administrative, clinical, and daily operations within the Wound Care and Hyperbaric Facility. Jeff is a Registered Respiratory Therapist and a Certified Hyperbaric Technologist (CHT). He has also undergone training as a UHMS Safety Director and a UHMS Facility Accreditation Surveyor. Jeff currently serves as a member of the UHMS Accreditation Council, the UHMS Accreditation Forum Expert Panel, and the UHMS Safety Committee. Additionally, he is an esteemed member of the NFPA 99 Hyperbaric and Hypobaric Facilities Technical Standards Committee. Jeff's dedication to the field has earned him numerous prestigious awards. In 2010, he received the Gurnee Award, which honored his outstanding contributions to undersea and hyperbaric medicine. Three years later, in 2013, he was awarded the Paul C. Baker Award for his commitment to Hyperbaric Oxygen Safety Excellence. Most recently, in 2020, Jeff was honored with "The Associates Distinguished Service Award (UHMSADS)," a recognition reserved for exceptional Associate members of the Society who have demonstrated exceptional professionalism and contributions deserving of the highest accolades.
Tiffany Hamm, BSN, RN, CWS, ACHRN, UHMSADS
An Advanced Certified Hyperbaric Registered Nurse and Certified Wound Specialist with expertise in billing, coding and reimbursement specific to hyperbaric medicine and wound care services. UHMS Accreditation Surveyor and Safety Director. Principal partner of Midwest Hyperbaric LLC, a hyperbaric and wound consultative service. Tiffany received her primary and advanced hyperbaric training through National Baromedical Services in Columbia South Carolina. In 2021, Tiffany received the UHMS Associate Distinguished Service Award. "This award is presented to individual Associate member of the Society whose professional activities and standing are deemed to be exceptional and deserving of the highest recognition we can bestow upon them . . . who have demonstrated devotion and significant time and effort to the administrative, clinical, mechanical, physiological, safety, technical practice, and/or advancement of the hyperbaric community while achieving the highest level of expertise in their respective field. . . demonstrating the professionalism and ethical standards embodied in this recognition and in the UHMS mission.”
Cathy Milne, APRN, MSN, CWOCN-AP
Advanced Practice Wound, Ostomy Continence Nurse at Connecticut Clinical Nursing Associates Connecticut Clinical Nursing Associates American University
Kim Simonson, RN-BC, ACHRN, CWS, FACCWS
Explore our Wound Care and Hyperbaric Solutions
t
-->