WoundReference logo

Legal Aspects in Wound Care

Legal Aspects in Wound Care

Legal Aspects in Wound Care

ABSTRACT

Legal aspects in wound care are critically relevant to wound care clinicians because lapses in diagnosis, treatment, or documentation can lead to costly malpractice claims, damage professional reputations, and compromise patient safety. In 2023, U.S. medical malpractice payouts exceeded $4.8 billion across 50,404 claims, underscoring the financial and professional stakes for clinicians. [1]

Medical malpractice claims: 

  • The most frequent allegations are related to diagnostic errors (failure to diagnose, delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis), which comprise 22% - 78% of all claims. [2][3][4]
  • Patient motivation for filing a lawsuit is often linked to communication failures, where poor relationships or unmet expectations - not necessarily clinical harm - drive patients to seek explanations and accountability. [5]

Common legal scenarios in wound care: 

  • In wound care specifically, over 17,000 pressure‐ulcer–related lawsuits are filed annually - the second most common claim after wrongful death and more than falls or emotional distress (AHRQ).[5]
  • Other common scenarios involve failure to properly diagnose or treat wounds, missed infections, inadequate follow-up and incomplete or inaccurate documentation. 

Risk management program:

  • Risk management program is a program of strategies for organizations to minimize the risk of harm to patients and decrease the healthcare provider’s exposure to liability.[6]
  • The following elements, expanded in more detail in this section, are essential for an effective risk management program.[6] Risk management Strategies and policies should be revised at least annually
  • Compliance with scope of practice
  • Malpractice and professional liability insurance
  • Optimization of clinician communication (with patients and among staff and other healthcare professionals)
    • Patient satisfaction 
    • Informed consent
  • Establishment and maintenance of efficient practice processes
  • Reinforcement of appropriate and complete documentation 
  • Quality assurance program
    • Internal audits
  • Continued education and ongoing competencies

Wound care clinicians can help prevent litigation by understanding the legal nuances in their day to day practice, educating primary care and emergency department clinicians about wound assessment, management and referrals, and by actively participating as specialists in referral networks. Healthcare organizations reduce risk by implementing same-day referral slots in wound care programs and robust care-coordination systems.

INTRODUCTION

Overview

This topic provides an overview of the legal landscape relevant to wound care clinicians. It covers essential legal definitions, the relevance and common causes of medical malpractice claims (with a focus on wound care scenarios), and an introduction to selected federal and state laws. Additionally, it details the process and consequences of medical malpractice claims, common legal pitfalls in wound care with real-life examples, and key elements of an effective risk management program. For a practical approach to applying principles of ethics in wound care refer to topic "Medical Ethics In Wound Care".  For details on standard of care, see topic "Standard of Care: Foundations for Wound". Management.


Background

Definition

  • Standard of Care: standard of care is the benchmark that determines whether professional obligations to patients have been met.[7] Failure to meet the standard of care is negligence, which can carry significant consequences for clinicians.[7] As a result, the standard of care is what medical malpractice cases are built upon.[7] For details, refer to topic “ Standard of Care: Foundations of Wound Management”. 
  • Care settings: healthcare setting represents a broad array of services and places where healthcare occurs. Examples include acute care hospitals, urgent care centers, outpatient surgery centers, private offices or homes. See Table 1 below.
  • Scope of practice: scope of practice refers to activities that a person licensed to practice as a health professional is permitted to perform, which is increasingly determined by statutes enacted by state legislatures and by rules adopted by the appropriate licensing entity.[8]
  • Professional regulatory entities: 
    • Nursing Regulatory Bodies (NRBs): jurisdictional governmental agencies in each state that are responsible for the regulation of nursing practice, and for ensuring the safe practice of nursing. It outlines the standards for safe nursing care and issues licenses to practice nursing, monitors licensees' compliance to jurisdictional laws and takes action against the licenses of those nurses who have exhibited unsafe nursing practice. Each NRB reinforces each jurisdiction’s Nurse Practice Act.
    • State Medical Boards: state medical boards are the agencies that license medical doctors, investigate complaints, discipline physicians who violate the medical practice act, and refer physicians for evaluation and rehabilitation when appropriate. [9][10]
  • Federal law: federal laws are rules that apply throughout the United States.[11] For details, see section ‘Selected Federal Laws’ below. Examples in healthcare include:
    • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): HIPAA primarily focuses on protecting patients' personal health information [12]
    • Federal fraud and abuse laws
      • Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), 
      • Federal False Claims Act (FCA),
      • Physician self-referral law (Stark law)
  • State law: state laws are the legal rules and regulations established by individual states within the United States (US). [11] Relevant examples include:
    • Nurse Practice Acts: state regulations that define nurses’ scope of practice based on their qualifications and role. These acts, along with a healthcare facility's policies, establish the standards nurses must meet.[13]
    • Medical Practice Act: state-specific laws and regulations that govern the practice of medicine and specify the responsibilities of the medical board in regulating that practice laid out in a state statute. [9]
  • Medical error: the American Medical Association (AMA) defines a medical error as an “unintended act or omission, or a flawed system or plan, that harms or has the potential to harm a patient” [14]
  • Medical malpractice: medical malpractice occurs when a hospital, doctor or other health care professional, through a negligent act or omission, causes an injury to a patient. The negligence might be the result of errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare or health management.[15]
    • To win a malpractice case, the plaintiff (e.g., a patient or representative) must prove four elements [7][16]:
      • Duty: the clinician had a duty to provide standard care
      • Negligence: the clinician failed to meet the standard of care
      • Harm: the plaintiff suffered harm, and
      • Causation: the harm was caused by the clinician's failure to meet the standard of care. 
    • Examples of medical malpractice: medical malpractice can take many forms. Here are some examples of medical negligence that might lead to a lawsuit [15]:
      • Failure to diagnose, delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis
      • Misreading or ignoring laboratory results
      • Unnecessary procedures
      • Poor follow-up or aftercare
      • Disregarding or not taking appropriate patient history
      • Failure to order proper testing
    • Special Defense: a Special Defense is a legal reason why the Defendant should not be found liable, or responsible, for an allegation.[16][17] Examples include:
      • Good Samaritan Statute: designed to encourage medical professionals to intervene to save lives and prevent serious injury when they would otherwise have no legal duty to do so. These laws protect licensed clinicians from civil liability when they voluntarily render emergency treatment. They are still liable, however, for gross negligence.[18]
      • Sudden emergency: A valid defensive doctrine accepted in law, the “sudden emergency” defense acknowledges that a person confronted with a sudden or unexpected situation demanding immediate action may not use the same degree of judgment as he would in normal circumstances.[16]
    • Risk Management: Risk management is a program of strategies to minimize the risk of harm to patients and to decrease the healthcare provider’s exposure to liability. [6]

Table 1. Care settings and Place of Service Codes assigned to each care setting by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) [19]

Selected Care Settings and Place of Service Codes per CMS
  • 11: Office
  • 12: Home
  • 13: Assisted Living Facility
  • 14: Group Home
  • 31: Skilled Nursing Facility
  • 32: Nursing Facility
  • 33: Custodial Care Facility

Relevance

  • In 2023, medical malpractice claims in the US resulted in over $4.8 billion in payouts, with more than 50,404 claims paid.[1]
    • The primary goals of the U.S. medical malpractice system are to provide compensation to those harmed by medical negligence, hold responsible parties accountable, and discourage unsafe medical practices and errors.[20]
    • While malpractice concerns are widespread, the number of claims filed is lower than the number of people seeking legal advice for medical issues, and the number of successful claims is even smaller.[6][21]
      • Research on closed claims from 2016 to 2018 showed that 65% were dropped, dismissed, or withdrawn, and only 6% resulted in a trial verdict. Of those trial verdicts, 89% were ruled in favor of the defendant.[21]
  • Affected professionals: physicians are the primary target of malpractice lawsuits. 
    • In 2024, 81.9% of malpractice payments were for claims against physicians and dentists, compared to 7.9% of payments for claims against professional nurses, and 10% for all other healthcare practitioners.[1] 
    • Among physicians, 34% have been sued, with 16.8% having been sued more than twice.[22]
    • Interestingly, the quality of care provided does not appear to be a significant factor in most malpractice claims, as there are no notable differences in quality between physicians who have and have not been sued.[23]
  • Main causes of medical malpractice claims: 
    • Medical errors and serious harms in the US healthcare system are estimated to cause 371,000 deaths and 424,000 permanent disabilities annually across various care settings. [4]
    • Diagnostic error (misdiagnosis or missed or delayed diagnosis) is the most common allegation in malpractice claims, which account for 22% to 78% of all claims. [2] [3] [4]
      • Diagnostic errors can occur in any of the 7 stages of the diagnostic process listed below. [24]
        • Access and presentation, 
        • History taking/collection, 
        • Physical exam,
        • Testing, 
        • Assessment, 
        • Referral, 
        • Follow-up 
      • Interestingly, the quality of care provided does not appear to be a significant factor in most malpractice claims, as there are no notable differences in quality between physicians who have and have not been sued.[23]
    • Communication issues: the motivation for patients and families to sue for malpractice often does not involve a medical injury. Instead, patients and families are typically motivated by communication problems, poor relationships, and unmet expectations. Studies show that most people are looking for an explanation and accountability to prevent the situation from happening again.[5] See Table 2.
  • Lawsuits in wound care: in wound care, lawsuits can arise from various scenarios, including failure to properly treat wounds, misdiagnosis of wound infections, or inadequate wound care leading to complications. 
    • According to the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ), more than 17,000 lawsuits are related to pressure ulcers/injuries (PU/PI) annually. It is the second most common claim after wrongful death and greater than falls or emotional distress.[25]
      • Common legal pitfalls related to PU/PI include the following [26]:
        • Failure to: 
          • Perform and document initial skin exam
          • Establish accurate staging (staging drives dressing and surface choices)
          • Implement proper wound care
          • Evaluate and implement plan for nutrition
          • Implement proper pressure redistribution surface(s)
          • Implement and document turning and repositioning schedule
        • Delay in recognition and intervention for worsening wound

Table 2. Common Reasons Patients May File a Malpractice Lawsuit [5][6]

Specific Reasons for Filing a Malpractice Claim
  • Problems with patient-physician communication
  • Poor relationship with the healthcare provider
  • Desire for information about what happened
  • Feeling of not being informed
  • Desire to prevent the situation from happening to another person
  • Unmet expectations or unwanted outcomes
  • Desire for accountability/revenge
  • Suspicion of cover-up
  • Feeling of not being appropriately referred
  • Financial need
  • Pain and suffering
  • Advice from another (knowledgeable friend or acquaintance or healthcare provider)
  • Television ad for law firm

SELECTED LAWS

Federal Laws

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

  • The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 establishes federal standards for protecting sensitive health information from disclosure without patient's consent. [12]
    • HIPAA Privacy Rule: the US Department of Health and Human Services issued the HIPAA Privacy Rule to implement HIPAA requirements. 
    • HIPAA Security Rule: the HIPAA Security Rule protects specific information covered by the Privacy Rule.

Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws

Among the most important federal fraud and abuse laws that apply to providers are the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), and the physician self-referral law (Stark law), explained below. [27]

  • Relevance: these laws should be of special concern to wound care practitioners, who typically treat a high percentage of patients who are beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs.[27][28]
  • Penalties: failing to comply with these laws can result in [27][28] :
    • Criminal penalties
    • Civil fines
    • Exclusion from federal healthcare programs
    • Loss of the healthcare provider’s state medical license
Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS)

In some industries, it is acceptable to reward those who refer business to a provider. However, in the Federal health care programs, paying for referrals is a crime. The AKS prohibits offering, soliciting, or receiving anything of value in exchange for referrals of federal healthcare program business. Remuneration can include cash, recreational travel, tickets to events, meals, and other non-cash benefits. [27][28]

  • Obvious examples of AKS violation include
    • A pharmaceutical or medical device sales representative offers free lunches to a provider’s office staff.
    •  A durable medical equipment company provides free equipment to a wound care clinic. 
  • Less obvious examples of AKS violation include
    • Sales representatives assist with treating patients (e.g. when sales representatives apply a product or prepare a wound) or help with clerical or administrative work (e.g. help staff at the front desk, review charts)
    • Sales representatives provide excessive free samples, or the guarantee of reimbursement for a wound care product. 
  • Penalties for AKS violation include: 
    • For manufacturers: fines up to $50,000 per violation, plus three times the amount of the improper remuneration, potential prison terms, and exclusion from federal healthcare programs.
    • For healthcare practitioners: prison, fines, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs (e.g. Medicare, Medicaid), which could cause a significant impact in clinical practices.
False Claims Act (FCA)

The FCA prohibits submitting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government.[27][28]

  • Examples
    • A claim can be considered false if the service was not carried out (e.g. billing for conservative sharp wound debridements that were not performed), was previously reimbursed, was miscoded, or is not supported by medical records. 
    • The government can also consider a claim false if it is for grossly inadequate care. 
  • Penalties for FCA violations include:
    • For healthcare practitioners: treble damages (i.e., provider may be fined an amount up to three times the amount of the program’s loss), fines, and exclusion from federal healthcare programs.
Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law)

The Stark law prohibits physicians from making referrals for designated health services to an entity in which they or their immediate family members have a financial interest, unless an exception applies.[27][28]

  • Example:
    • A provider group invests in a home health agency and refers patients treated by the providers to the home health agency that the provider group owns. 
  • Penalties for Start Law violation
    • Unless a specific Stark law regulatory exception applies, penalties for Stark law violations include repayment, fines, and exclusion from federal healthcare programs. 
    • The entity receiving the referral is also prohibited from submitting claims for services provided as a result of a prohibited referral.

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

The Process of a Medical Malpractice Claim

Familiarity with the stages of a medical malpractice lawsuit can help healthcare providers avoid such claims.

  • Plaintiff (e.g., a patient that makes a legal complaint about a provider in a court of law) establishes the appropriate standard of care and demonstrates it was breached[20]
    • Establishment of standard of care: the standard of care is primarily defined by other practitioners with similar qualifications who give expert testimony regarding how they would have managed the patient's care under similar circumstances.[20]
      • Expert testimony is based on the practitioner’s knowledge, skill, experience, and training, and may be supported by literature, practice guidelines, and surveys.
  • Four elements must be established: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. 
    • These elements must be proven by a "preponderance of the evidence," meaning there is more than a 50% probability that the malpractice occurred. [20]
  • Jury’s decision: malpractice cases are decided on the basis of what a “jury is likely to think is fact” rather than actual fact. [20]

The Consequences of Medical Malpractice Claims 

The consequences of medical malpractice can be severe, impacting both the healthcare provider's personal and professional life, as well as the patient's well-being. 

These consequences may include:

  • Legal ramifications:
    • Trial: healthcare providers may face a trial in a court of law.
    • Jail: in cases of gross negligence or intentional harm, healthcare professionals may face incarceration.
    • Fines: monetary penalties may be imposed on healthcare providers found liable for malpractice or negligence.
  • Disciplinary action against License: regulatory bodies, such as the Board of Nursing (BON) and State Medical Boards, have the authority to take disciplinary action against healthcare professionals who violate the standards of practice.[9][10] These actions may include:
    • License Suspension: prohibiting clinicians from practicing for a specified period.
    • Fines: monetary penalties may be imposed by the regulatory agency .
    • Other Disciplinary Actions: depending on the severity of the violation, the regulatory agency may impose additional disciplinary actions, such as mandatory education, probation, or permanent revocation of the license.
  • Personal and professional effects: the consequences of a malpractice claim extend beyond the legal and regulatory realm, significantly impacting the healthcare professional's personal and professional life.[29] These effects can include:
    • Psychological Effects: from stress and anxiety associated with a malpractice claim.
    • Reputational Damage: a malpractice claim can tarnish a healthcare professional's reputation, making it difficult to find employment or maintain patient trust.
    • Time Commitment: defending against a malpractice claim can be a time-consuming process. 
    • Financial Burden: legal fees and other costs associated with a malpractice claim can create a financial burden for healthcare professionals.
    • Loss of Privileges: Healthcare professionals may lose hospital privileges or the ability to participate in insurance plans as a result of a malpractice claim.

COMMON LEGAL SCENARIOS IN WOUND CARE 

Legal issues that commonly arise in wound care involve inadequate documentation and failure to meet standard of care. Specific examples of these issues, as well as real wound care litigation examples are explored in this section.

Real-World Examples of Litigations in Wound Care

This section provides real-life case examples relevant to legal considerations in wound care practice (see Table 3)

In wound care, several real cases also stem from diagnostic errors (i.e., misdiagnosis, missed or delayed diagnosis). As mentioned above, diagnostic errors can be broken down into pitfalls that occur during the diagnostic process: 

  • Access and presentation
  • History taking/collection
  • Physical exam
  • Testing
  • Assessment
  • Referral 
  • Follow-up 

Table 3. Sample published litigations cases in wound care [30]

TitleMalpractice Details

Sheldon vs United States

  • A patient sued the hospital for not providing wound care instructions after receiving treatment for a bite in the emergency room.
  • The wound became gangrenous, which resulted in finger amputation.
  • The patient argued that the lack of wound care instructions led to the gangrene and amputation.

Gonzalez vs Padilla

  • A patient suffered a degloving wound injury.
  • The patient was stabilized in a hospital and then transferred to a rehabilitation facility to receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for 4 weeks.
  • The patient did not tolerate HBOT well and only received 3 treatments.
  • The patient was discharged home with home health services.
  • Neither the hospital nor the rehabilitation facility ordered antibiotics.
  • Nine days after discharge, the home health nurse discovered gangrene in the wound.
  • This resulted in an amputation.

McComas vs Miller

  • A patient's foot ulcer was treated for over a year with regular weekly visits, including a skin graft and resection.
  • The patient was compliant with all care.
  • The wound was never biopsied and turned out to be a malignant melanoma.
  • The patient died of metastatic disease.
  • The patient's family sued for failure to diagnose the correct wound type, resulting in delayed intervention and death.

Bartlett vs Cope

  • A patient was treated weekly from February to June for "foot cellulitis".
  • The wound deteriorated and was diagnosed with osteomyelitis.
  • A partial foot amputation was performed in June.
  • The healthcare provider was sued for failing to use expected wound evaluation practices to evaluate the lack of healing progress for a non-healing foot ulcer and failing to diagnose and treat the osteomyelitis until amputation was required

Inadequate Documentation

Accurate, complete, and consistent documentation of the wound assessment is required in the practice of wound care. This includes a thorough description of how the wound appears and the characteristics of the wound bed, drainage, size, etc. and any changes or stalling of wound healing with each patient encounter. Good documentation is one of the best ways to protect the healthcare professional if involved in a lawsuit.[30][31][32] Of note

  • Errors and omissions in the wound assessment documentation are frequently emphasized by prosecuting lawyers.
  • Lawyers often look for incomplete, inaccurate, and illogical documentation in medical records and are trained to notice the smallest details. 

Table 4 illustrates examples of the types of documentation that can lead to litigation issues:

Table 4. Examples of Inadequate Documentation in Wound Care

Type of DocumentationExamples

Wound description

  • Inconsistent wound location: documentation alternates between coccyx and sacrum or between sacrum and ischium.
  • Laterality errors: right versus left side is recorded incorrectly.
  • Incorrect use of medical terminology when describing the wound bed tissue, exudate, and the periwound skin.
    • For instance, if a wound bed is documented as 50% erythema and 50% yellow slough, the clinician is using incorrect terminology. Erythema is a term used to describe the periwound and not the wound bed, which would be described as covered with granulation tissue, slough, or eschar. For details on terminology, see topic "How to Assess a Patient with Chronic Wounds".
  • Inconsistent documentation: A new tunnel or drainage is documented and measured by the nurse, yet the provider notes “no change in wound status”. 
  • Missing wound identifiers: wound numbers (e.g., “Wound 1,” “Wound 2”) are not used consistently in progress notes.

Wound measurements

  • Omitted or partial documentation: the standard wound measurement should include length, width, and depth of the wound, and measurement of tunnels and/or undermining if present.
    • If a previously documented tunnel, for example, a 3 cm tunnel documented one week prior and packed, is not documented during the current visit, it could indicate that the packing was not completely removed or that an assessment was omitted.
  • Inconsistent documentation: 
    • If the nurse and provider record different wound measurements during the same visit, inconsistent documentation can undermine the reliability of the documentation in legal proceedings.
    • Wound measurements demonstrate increased size since last visit, but the provider states that the wound “is smaller” or “improving.”
  • Contradictory documentation: documentation of wound depth when a wound is also documented as “healed”, “resolved”, or “epithelialized”. These terms mean the wound is closed completely and therefore does not have depth.

Wound photography

Wound photos can provide documentation to substantiate written descriptions of wounds. Photos should contain a reference of measure such as a ruler within the photo, the date, and the wound number and be attached to the patient record. See section 'Wound Measurement' in topic "How to Assess a Patient with Chronic Wounds".
  • Common legal risks related to wound photography 
  • Blurred images: poor focus can obscure important wound characteristics (depth, undermining, tunneling), undermining clinical decision-support and legal defensibility.
  • Inconsistent distance and orientation: varying camera-to-wound distance or angle between visits makes it impossible to compare healing progress objectively.
  • Omitted images: failure to capture photographs at every visit—or missing key views—creates gaps in the medical record.
  • Mislabeling:  Applying the wrong wound number, side (right vs. left), or patient identifier can lead to treatment errors and undermine chart integrity.
  • Non–HIPAA–compliant images: Including patient identifiers in photos or storing them insecurely violates HIPAA and exposes the facility to privacy breaches.

Vascular assessment for lower extremity ulcers

  • Lack of documentation of vascular assessment for lower extremity ulcers, including:
    • Full vascular examination (e.g. pulse palpation, capillary refill, skin temperature).
    • Ankle–Brachial Index (ABI) and/or Toe–Brachial Index (TBI) or other form of noninvasive arterial vascular testing.
    • See section 'Noninvasive Arterial Tests' in topic "Arterial Ulcers - Introduction and Assessment"

Ulcer Classification/ Staging 

  • Inappropriate utilization of ulcer classification/staging systems: the Wagner Grade Classification is specifically for diabetic foot ulcers and the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Ulcer/Injury (PU/PI) Staging system is specifically for PU/PI . Documenting a venous stasis ulcer with a Wagner Grade, such as Grade 1, or classifying an abdominal surgical wound as a Stage 3 is inaccurate documentation.
  • PU/PI incorrect staging: a PU/PI is incorrectly staged when documentation indicates a 100% eschar-covered wound bed and also specifies a depth level. In such instances, the depth cannot be determined, and therefore the stage should be classified as unstageable.
    • See topics 

Diagnosis

  • Misdiagnosis of PU/PI: 
    • Coding and naming an ulcer as a PU/PI when no pressure, friction, or shear is present.
    • Mis-identifying moisture associated skin damage and Stage 2 PI/PU
  • Coding misalignment: the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code assigned does not match the clinical documentation.

Treatment

  • Inconsistent provider order and actual treatment: discrepancy between the provider order and actual treatment can happen when orders are verbalized and carried out and documented at a later time with omissions or differences. For instance:
    • During a nurse visit, the nurse proactively changes the dressing type to meet the changing characteristics of a wound, however fails to contact the treatment provider and obtain an order for the change in treatment.
    • It is important to note that: 
      • All dressings require a provider order.
      • Nurse Visits and Home Care visits each require a provider order, frequency, and reason. They are part of the documented plan of care.

Patient education

  • Lack of documentation that patient education was provided. Documentation should include wound care instructions (e.g. written, verbal, handouts) including but not limited to: 
    • Procedures performed
    • Dressings applied
    • Nutrition guidance
    • Potential signs and symptoms of complications, how to recognize them, when to contact the healthcare provider, and who to contact. 

Electronic Health Record (EHR)

  • EHRs are used in most healthcare settings and may offer faster documentation through templates and checkbox answer selections.
  • Common legal risks associated with the use of EHRs: 
    • Copy and paste: clinicians should be careful not to copy and paste the same note or assessment from visit to visit. Each encounter should contain information from the current assessment which is rarely 100% the same as the previous visit.
    • Checking boxes inadvertently: healthcare workers need to be aware of the verbiage generated when they check a box in the EHR. Checking “WNL” for pedal pulses may generate verbiage for both right and left feet on a patient with a AKA.
    • Delayed documentation: ensure documentation is timely. The EHR tracks the exact time of all documentation. Avoid large gaps in time between when care is performed and documentation of that care.

Failure to meet standard of care

Preventable medical negligence can lead to limb amputations. Examples of such negligence are listed below [33].

  • Wrong-site surgery: removing the incorrect limb or body part (e.g., amputating the left foot instead of the right).
  • Inadequate thromboprophylaxis:  failing to prevent venous thromboembolism - such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) —during or after surgery.
  • Missed or delayed infection management: not identifying surgical‐site or soft-tissue infections early, or failing to initiate appropriate antibiotic therapy and debridement.
  • Failure to recognize critical limb ischemia: overlooking signs of poor arterial perfusion (e.g. pain at rest, nonhealing wounds, diminished pulses) and not ordering and documenting vascular studies (e.g. Ankle–Brachial Index or arterial Doppler).
  • Neglecting diabetic foot injuries: failing to diagnose or treat foot ulcers, neuropathy, or minor trauma in patients with diabetes, allowing progression to severe infection or osteomyelitis.

RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Risk management program is a program of strategies to minimize the risk of harm to patients and decrease the healthcare provider’s exposure to liability. [6]

  • An effective risk management program includes both proactive and reactive components.
    • Proactive component: strategies to prevent adverse occurrences
    • Reactive component: strategies for responding to adverse occurrences (i.e., minimizing loss)

The following elements, expanded in more detail in this section, are essential for an effective risk management program.[6] Risk management Strategies and policies should be revised at least annually.

  • Compliance with scope of practice
  • Malpractice and professional liability insurance
  • Optimization of clinician communication (with patients and among staff and other healthcare professionals)
    • Patient satisfaction 
    • Informed consent
  • Establishment and maintenance of efficient practice processes, along with policies and procedures on: 
    • Missed appointments
    • Follow-up on test results
    • Management of medications
    • Patient termination
  • Reinforcement of appropriate and complete documentation 
    • Medical record retention
  •  Quality assurance program
    • Internal audits
  • Continued education and ongoing competencies 

Scope of practice

  • State regulations regarding scope of practice vary. Clinicians should consult their respective state's professional licensing board.
    • For example, regulations regarding conservative sharp wound debridement by registered Nurses (RNs) are discussed in the topic “ State-by-State Regulations on Conservative Sharp Debridement by Nurses in the United States”. 
    • Additional information can be found on the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) website.[34]
  • Common Examples of Out-of-Scope Actions:
  • A National Provider Identifier (NPI) holder's order is required for all treatments, dressing changes, and lab orders, and must be followed. Wound Nurses cannot alter orders.
  • Hyperbaric Oxygen (HBO) technicians cannot accept verbal orders unless their license scope permits. An Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) license allows verbal orders only in the field or under the supervision of an Emergency Department physician.

Sample scope of practice by role is listed in Table 5. Scope of practice often varies according to each state. 

Table 5. Scope of Practice by Role [35]add other references, review

Scope of Practice by Role

Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN)

Role: The APRN works independently or in collaboration with a physician (according to state practice acts and facility/agency policies) to lead the interdisciplinary wound care team to plan and provide care for the patient at risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure, and facility or agency-based credentialing and privileging requirements to prescribe medications, order tests and treatments, and make necessary referrals.
  • Independently or in collaboration with the physician comprehensively assesses and establishes wound diagnosis, prognosis, and wound care treatment.
  • As a leader, provides oversight, assistance and guidance to other members of the interdisciplinary wound care team to establish and provide a comprehensive approach to wound management that includes all disciplines and promotes optimum outcomes.
  • Provides bedside treatments to include conservative sharp debridement, when indicated and permitted by state practice acts and facility policy.
  • Independently, or in collaboration with other interdisciplinary wound care team members, develops and implements wound prevention, skin management, and wound treatment programs and provides corresponding education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Collaborates with other wound care professionals to promote research and assess findings to establish updated, relevant approaches to improve wound prevention and wound care practices.
  • Collaborates with other wound care team members to promote the facility or agency quality improvement program.

Registered Nurse (RN)

Role: The RN plays a key role in oversight of the patient at-risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure.
  • Develops and implements wound prevention, skin management, and wound treatment programs and provides corresponding education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • In conjunction with prescribing providers orders (physician, APRN, physician assistant), provides consultation and/or hands-on care for wound prevention or management. Performs comprehensive assessments and reassessments to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective use of wound management products and resources. Hands-on care may include conservative sharp debridement/chemical cauterization with a provider order, per facility guidelines and if allowed according to individual state practice act.
  • Delegates appropriate wound prevention and wound care actions to LPN/LVNs and unlicensed assistive personnel (e.g. health technicians, nursing assistants).
  • As an interdisciplinary wound care team member, collaborates to establish individualized, comprehensive care plans that promote wound prevention and healing.
  • Establishes, reevaluates and revises facility policies, procedures, and guidelines governing wound care, based on needs, evidenced-based trends, and industry changes.
  • Observes patient’s response and wound status, reporting any changes to the provider or supervising clinician, according to facility or agency guidelines.
  • Provides and reinforces education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff regarding preventative measures, interventions, and individualized patient treatment plans.
  • As a patient advocate, promotes facility/agency-based quality improvement that addresses wound prevention and the specialized complex needs of the wound care patient.

Licensed Practical Nurse/Licensed Vocational Nurse (LPN/LVN)

Role: Under the supervision, delegation, and guidance of the registered nurse or prescribing provider (e.g. physician, APRN, or physician’s assistant), the LPN/LVN provides the prescribed care to the patient at-risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure.
  • As an interdisciplinary wound care team member, provides input for care plan consideration that promotes wound prevention and healing.
  • Implements preventative care, monitors skin status, and performs wound treatments per orders in the individualized patient’s treatment plan.
  • Provides and reinforces education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff that is consistent with the established care plan for preventative measures, interventions, and individualized patient treatments.
  • Observes patient’s response and wound status, reporting any changes to the registered nurse or supervising clinician, according to facility or agency guidelines.
  • Contributes to the facility or agency quality improvement program, as assigned.

Physical Therapist (PT)/Occupational Therapist (OT)

Role: The PT and OT play a key role in oversight of the patient at-risk of or with wound care needs while working under the guidance of a prescribing provider (e.g. physician, APRN, Physician Assistant). Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure.
  • As part of the interdisciplinary wound care team, contributes to the establishment and revision of the individualized, comprehensive care plan to promote wound prevention and healing, and provides input for care plan consideration and implementation per established protocols.
  • In conjunction with prescribing providers orders (physician, APRN, physician assistant), provides consultation and/or hands-on care for wound prevention or management.
  • Delegates appropriate actions for adjunctive modalities specific to therapy administration, as part of an established individualized plan of care, to PT assistants and OT assistants.
  • Assesses, recommends, and provides adjunctive modalities specific to therapy administration within the state’s scope of practice for therapy clinicians.
  • Assesses and makes recommendations for support surface selection.
  • Provides and reinforces education, consistent with therapy-related aspects of the individualized care plan (e.g. proper positioning, mobility), to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Observes patient’s response and wound status, reporting any changes to the supervising clinician, according to facility or agency guidelines.
  • Contributes to the facility or agency quality improvement program, as assigned.

Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA)

Role: The PTA plays a key role in oversight of the patient at-risk of or with wound care needs while working under the supervision of a Physical Therapist (PT). Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure.
  • As part of the interdisciplinary wound care team, contributes to the establishment and revision of the individualized, comprehensive care plan to promote wound prevention and healing, and provides input for care plan consideration and implementation per established protocols.
  • In conjunction with prescribing provider’s orders (physician, APRN, physician assistant), and supervision of the PT, provides consultation and/or hands-on care for wound prevention or management.
  • Initiates appropriate actions for adjunctive modalities specific to therapy administration, as part of an established individualized plan of care, and as directed by the PT.
  • Assesses, recommends, and provides adjunctive modalities specific to therapy administration within the state’s scope of practice for PTAs.
  • Assesses and makes recommendations for support surface selection.
  • Provides and reinforces education, consistent with therapy-related aspects of the individualized care plan (e.g. proper positioning, mobility), to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Observes patient’s response and wound status, reporting any changes to the supervising clinician, according to facility or agency guidelines.
  • Contributes to the facility or agency quality improvement program, as assigned.

Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA)

Role: The OTA plays a key role in oversight of the patient at-risk of or with wound care needs while working under the supervision of an Occupational Therapist (OT). Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure.
  • As part of the interdisciplinary wound care team, contributes to the establishment and revision of the individualized, comprehensive care plan to promote wound prevention and healing, and provides input for care plan consideration and implementation per established protocols.
  • In conjunction with prescribing provider’s orders (physician, APRN, physician assistant), and supervision of the OT, provides consultation and/or hands-on care for wound prevention or management.
  • Initiates appropriate actions for adjunctive modalities specific to therapy administration, as part of an established individualized plan of care, and as directed by the OT.
  • Assesses, recommends, and provides adjunctive modalities specific to therapy administration within the state’s scope of practice for OTAs.
  • Assesses and makes recommendations for support surface selection.
  • Provides and reinforces education, consistent with therapy-related aspects of the individualized care plan (e.g. proper positioning, mobility), to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Observes patient’s response and wound status, reporting any changes to the supervising clinician, according to facility or agency guidelines.
  • Contributes to the facility or agency quality improvement program, as assigned.

Physician

Role: The physician works independently or in collaboration with an APRN/PA to lead the interdisciplinary wound care team to plan and provide care for the patient at-risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure, and facility or agency-based credentialing and privileging requirements to provide patient care.
  • Independently or in collaboration with the APRN or PA, the physician establishes wound diagnosis, prognosis, and wound care treatment.
  • Orders appropriate referrals and tests, when indicated.
  • As a leader, provides oversight, assistance and guidance to other members of the interdisciplinary wound care team to establish a comprehensive approach to wound management that includes all disciplines and promotes optimal outcomes.
  • Collaborates with the APRN, PA, RN and other wound care team members to develop a wound prevention plan.
  • Provides bedside treatments to include conservative sharp debridement when needed.
  • Works with the interdisciplinary team to educate patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff regarding preventative measures, interventions, and individualized patient treatment plans.
  • Collaborates with other wound care professionals to promote research and assess findings to establish updated, relevant approaches to improve wound prevention and wound care practices.
  • Collaborates with other wound care team members to promote the facility or agency quality improvement program.

Physician Assistant (PA)

Role: The PA works independently or in collaboration with a physician (according to state practice acts and facility/agency policies) to lead the interdisciplinary wound care team to plan and provide care for the patient at risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure, and facility or agency-based credentialing and privileging requirements to prescribe medications, order tests and treatments, and make necessary referrals.
  • Independently or in collaboration with the physician comprehensively assesses and establishes wound diagnosis, prognosis, and wound care treatment.
  • As a leader, provides oversight, assistance and guidance to other members of the interdisciplinary wound care team to establish and provide a comprehensive approach to wound management that includes all disciplines and promotes optimum outcomes.
  • Provides bedside treatments to include conservative sharp debridement, when indicated and permitted by state practice acts and facility policy.
  • Independently, or in collaboration with other interdisciplinary wound care team members, develops and implements wound prevention, skin management, and wound treatment programs and provides corresponding education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Collaborates with other wound care professionals to promote research and assess findings to establish updated, relevant approaches to improve wound prevention and wound care practices.
  • Collaborates with other wound care team members to promote the facility or agency quality improvement program.

Assistant/Associate Physician

Role: The Assistant Physician works independently or in collaboration with a physician (according to state practice acts and facility/agency policies) to lead the interdisciplinary wound care team to plan and provide care for the patient at risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure, and facility or agency-based credentialing and privileging requirements to prescribe medications, order tests and treatments, and make necessary referrals.
  • Independently or in collaboration with the physician comprehensively assesses and establishes wound diagnosis, prognosis, and wound care treatment.
  • As a leader, provides oversight, assistance and guidance to other members of the interdisciplinary wound care team to establish and provide a comprehensive approach to wound management that includes all disciplines and promotes optimum outcomes.
  • Provides bedside treatments to include conservative sharp debridement, when indicated and permitted by state practice acts and facility policy.
  • Independently, or in collaboration with other interdisciplinary wound care team members, develops and implements wound prevention, skin management, and wound treatment programs and provides corresponding education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Collaborates with other wound care professionals to promote research and assess findings to establish updated, relevant approaches to improve wound prevention and wound care practices.
  • Collaborates with other wound care team members to promote the facility or agency quality improvement program.

Doctor of Podiatric Medicine (DPM)

Role: The DPM works independently or in collaboration with other team members (according to state practice acts and facility/agency policies) to lead the interdisciplinary wound care team to plan and provide care for the patient at risk of or with wound care needs. Responsibilities include but are not limited to:

  • Abides by state practice acts, regulations, and laws established within the state/states of licensure, and facility or agency-based credentialing and privileging requirements to prescribe medications, order tests and treatments, and make necessary referrals.
  • Independently or in collaboration with the team members comprehensively assesses and establishes lower extremity wound diagnosis, prognosis, and wound care treatment.
  • As a leader, provides oversight, assistance and guidance to other members of the interdisciplinary wound care team to establish and provide a comprehensive approach to wound management that includes all disciplines and promotes optimum outcomes.
  • Provides bedside treatments to include conservative sharp debridement, when indicated.
  • Independently, or in collaboration with other interdisciplinary wound care team members, develops and implements wound prevention, skin management, and wound treatment programs and provides corresponding education to patients, family members/caregivers, and facility/agency staff.
  • Collaborates with other wound care professionals to promote research and assess findings to establish updated, relevant approaches to improve wound prevention and wound care practices.
  • Collaborates with other wound care team members to promote the facility or agency quality improvement program.

Malpractice and professional liability insurance

Malpractice and professional liability insurance may protect healthcare clinicians, both licensed and unlicensed (including administrative staff), from lawsuits alleging harm due to negligence or intentional mistreatment, including patient death. Coverage can be individual or group, purchased or employer-provided. Limits typically range from US $100,000 to $3 million, and terms/premiums vary among carriers. [36]

  • Scope of Coverage: malpractice insurance generally covers [36]:
    • Medical accidents and errors, including bodily injury and adverse reactions.
    • Improper treatment, such as failure to follow protocols or accidental omissions.
    • Inadequate supervision, where a practitioner might be held liable for another's mistake.
    • Negligent care that is perceived as substandard.
    • Attorney and court fees.
    • Arbitration costs.
    • Medical and compensatory damages.
    • Payouts and settlements.
    • HIPAA violation fines.
  • Exclusions: each policy is different, but coverage typically does not include [36]:
    • Cyber insurance.
    • Illegal activity.
    • Sexual misconduct.
    • Errors occurring while the provider is under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
  • Types of Professional Liability Insurance [36]:
    • 1. Occurrence: Provides lifetime coverage for incidents that happen while the policy is active, regardless of when the claim is filed.
    • 2. Claims-made: Covers incidents that both occurred and were reported during the policy's active period with that specific carrier. If the policy is not renewed and a claim arises from the active period, there is no coverage. A "tail coverage" policy can mitigate this risk.

Processes, policies and procedures 

Practices should have processes, policies and procedures in place to allow for wound care clinicians to consistently apply established standards, principles, and clinical guidelines to maximize healing outcomes and involve patients in decision-making.

Table 6 illustrates examples of the importance of policies, procedures and processes in wound care. For a list of policies, procedures in topic “Resources for Wound Care and HBOT Policies and Procedures” 

Table 6. The Importance of Policies, Procedures and Processes in Wound Care 

ActionRelevanceProcesses, policies and procedures needed

Care coordination: treat the whole patient

According to the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS): “Wound care involves the evaluation and treatment of a wound, including identifying potential causes of delayed wound healing and the modification of treatment when indicated. Wound evaluations may require a comprehensive medical evaluation, vascular evaluation, orthopedic evaluation, functional evaluation, metabolic/nutritional evaluation, and a plan of care” (CMS, L37166).[37]The standard of care calls for a team to work together to ensure all elements are evaluated on an ongoing basis.

Appropriate referrals: Timely consultation with pain specialists, dietitians, or other providers based on an individual's symptoms and assessed needs improves patient outcomes and decreases the risk of legal problems Refer to specialists when an assessment indicates it will be beneficial. Specialists that wound patients are frequently referred to include: 

  • Podiatry, Surgeons, Infectious Disease, Vascular, Hyperbaric Medicine
  • Physical, Occupational, Lymphedema Therapist
  • DME/stocking fitters
  • Nutritionist
  • Diabetes educator
  • Pain management
  • Social services
  • Home Care

Risk Assessments: Perform and Follow Through on Findings

Risk Assessments for pressure ulcers, malnutrition, neuropathy, depression and suicide risk, falls, compromised vascular flow to the lower extremity are routinely performed in the initial visit (s) and as part of assessment and evaluating a new patient with wound.

For "At Risk" patients, policies must mandate ordered, implemented, and evaluated follow-up interventions to avoid liability arising from deterioration due to lack of intervention orders, undocumented implementation, or ineffective follow-up. Patient adherence should be documented, including barriers and interventions for non-adherence. 

Infection Diagnosis and Management

Failure to assess, identify, and treat infection in a wound lead to the delay in care, deterioration of wound, sepsis, and death. Standard wound care includes assessing for and recognizing the signs and symptoms of infection. The provider is expected to recognize, diagnose, and treat wound infections timely and appropriately

Protocols for identifying, diagnosing and managing infection. See topic "Wound Infection"

Foreign Body

Missed foreign bodies frequently result in physician malpractice litigation. Wound care is the subject of 5-20% of lawsuit claims against emergency medicine (EM) physicians, resulting in 3-11% of monetary awards. [38]

  • Tunnels: 
    • Packing Removal
    • Tunnel Monitoring
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
    • No dressing is left retained or embedded into fresh granulation tissue.
    • Dressing count upon NPWT application, removal and dressing change.
  • Non-healing surgical wounds: assess for retained surgical materials.
  • Non-healing trauma wounds: assess for dirt, wood, gravel, bone chards, glass, and other debris that may be embedded as a result of the traumatic injury.

Communication 

Effective communication skills are a critical tool that assists the physician in establishing that optimal patient rapport. Patients judge the quality of care received on the basis of the physician-patient interaction. Establishing a positive relationship that includes effective communication can do much to prevent legal action. Patients do not sue providers whom they “like and trust”.[39] When patients and members of their circle of care (spouses, significant others, caregivers) are included in health care discussions and decision making, they are less likely to sue.

A communication breakdown is a common reason why patients choose to take legal action against providers. By using effective communication techniques, clinicians can create a positive relationship that reduces the likelihood of lawsuits and benefits both the clinician and the patient.[39]

  • The 4 Es communication model is an easy way to promote positive interaction at each patient encounter.
    • Engage. Invite patients to share their health stories. Ask open-ended questions to help you find out what matters most to the patient.
    • Empathize. Show patients that you see and hear them. Accept their values even if they are different from your own.
    • Educate. Ask patients what they know and want to know. Answer their questions, provide written information, and ask questions to confirm their understanding.
    • Enlist. Forge a partnership by collaborating with patients to make care decisions. Seek agreement on treatment plans and monitor progress.
  • Effective communication with patients and their families before and after procedures, including thorough wound care education and clear discharge instructions, are essential to avoid legal pitfalls.
  • Providing educational materials, such as handouts and access to patient portals, and documenting patient/caregiver understanding and response can mitigate risk. See topic "Patient Education in Wound Care and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy".
  • Timely and comprehensive communication with other healthcare providers involved in the patient's care, including those at skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and referral sources, is crucial. Documenting these interactions and any follow-up actions is also critical for risk management.
  • Documenting all phone calls related to patient care and discharge instructions is a key component of communication and risk management.

Informed Consent in Medical Care

  • The Joint Commission defines informed consent as a communication process between a clinician and a patient that leads to the patient's agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention.[40] This process involves:
    • Describing the nature of the procedure or intervention.
    • Explaining the risks and benefits of the procedure or intervention.
    • Discussing reasonable alternatives and their associated risks and benefits.
    • Assessing the patient's comprehension of these elements.
  • It is crucial to allow sufficient time for the patient to ask questions and discuss any concerns during the consent process, and this discussion should be documented. The consent form should include the patient's, provider's, and a witness's signatures, along with the date and time.
  • Key elements of a documented consent:
    • Signed and dated by the patient, provider, and a witness.
    • Consent for treatment is broad and begins at the start of care.
    • Consent for wound photographs is required and often included in the initial consent to treat within wound care and healthcare facilities.
  • Always verify that procedure-specific consent is complete and in the medical record before proceeding.

Documentation

Documentation is critical for defense. Lawsuits often occur long after care is provided, making reliance on documentation essential. Organized, concise practice and documentation demonstrate competence. Disorganized, omitted, or mismatched documentation can suggest sloppiness and raise doubts about competence for a jury. See section ‘Common Legal Scenarios: Documentation’ above. 

Quality Assurance Program

  • Quality is one of the cornerstones that can make the journey towards successful outcomes possible. Embedding Quality Assurance Programs and a culture of quality improvement and patient safety within all health systems can help mitigate harm and prevent medical malpractice. [41]
  • For a quality framework intended to be used for creation or assessment of wound care services, algorithms demonstrating application of evidence in product selection, quality measures specific to wound care, and guidance for wound and hyperbaric programs to successfully navigate the CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS), refer to topic “Quality in Wound Care”.

Internal Audits

  • According to the American Academy of Professional Coders (AAPC), quality health care is based on accurate and complete clinical documentation in the medical record.[42] Through internal audits of their medical documentation, healthcare facilities are able to determine areas that require improvements and corrections.
  • Medical auditing is the practice of conducting periodic internal or external reviews of coding accuracy, and of having policies, and procedures to ensure the service is running an efficient and liability-free operation.[42] Internal medical auditing is a self-review, conducted internally.
  • For details on internal audits in wound care and HBOT, refer to the topic “Internal Medical Documentation Auditing”.

Continued education

Ongoing professional development is crucial for healthcare professionals involved in wound care to ensure they provide the highest quality of patient care and mitigate potential legal risks. This encompasses several key aspects:

  • Orientation: wound care clinicians come from different backgrounds. An evidence-based approach to orientation in wound care can help ensure care standardization.
  • Ongoing Competencies: continuous learning and skill development are essential to stay abreast of the latest advancements in wound care practices, technologies, and research. 
  • Nonpunitive Remedial Education: in instances where a deviation from the expected standard of care is identified, a nonpunitive approach to remedial education is crucial. The goal is to improve future performance and prevent recurrence of errors. Resources such as competency assessments can help identify areas needing improvement.
  • Standard of care: maintaining the standard of care requires ongoing professional development and education to stay abreast of the latest advancements in wound care.
  • Target Healing Benchmarks: establishing and understanding target healing benchmarks is essential for effective wound management and risk mitigation. Lawyers often refer to these benchmarks when evaluating the appropriateness and effectiveness of care. The topic of "Applying Balanced Scorecard in Wound Management and Hyperbaric Medicine" discusses the use of performance indicators, including healing benchmarks, in clinical practice.

By prioritizing ongoing education, understanding the standard of care, and being aware of expected outcomes and healing benchmarks, wound care professionals can enhance patient outcomes and minimize their exposure to legal challenges. The resources provided offer valuable insights into these critical areas.

Official reprint from WoundReference® woundreference.com ©2025 Wound Reference, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Use of WoundReference is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement. ​
NOTE: This is a controlled document. This document is not a substitute for proper training, experience, and exercising of professional judgment. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents, neither the authors nor the Wound Reference, Inc. give any guarantee as to the accuracy of the information contained in them nor accept any liability, with respect to loss, damage, injury or expense arising from any such errors or omissions in the contents of the work.

REFERENCES

  1. . National Practitioner Data Bank. The NPDB - Data Analysis Tool [Internet] . 2025;.
  2. Gupta A, Snyder A, Kachalia A, Flanders S, Saint S, Chopra V et al. Malpractice claims related to diagnostic errors in the hospital. BMJ quality & safety. 2017;volume 27(1):.
  3. Wallace E, Lowry J, Smith SM, Fahey T et al. The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2013;volume 3(7):.
  4. Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC, Yu-Moe CW, Clemens GD, Wang Z, Zhu Y, Saber Tehrani AS, Fanai M, Hassoon A, Siegal D et al. Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ quality & safety. 2024;volume 33(2):109-120.
  5. Roberts RG. Seven reasons family doctors get sued and how to reduce your risk. Family practice management. 2003;volume 10(3):29-34.
  6. Alexander LL.. Risk Management NetCE.. 2025;.
  7. Vanderpool D. The Standard of Care. Innovations in clinical neuroscience. 2021;volume 18(7-9):50-51.
  8. . American Medical Association. What is scope of practice? . 2025;.
  9. Drew C, Thompson JN et al. The role of state medical boards. The virtual mentor : VM. 2005;volume 7(4):.
  10. . FSMB | About Physician Discipline . 2025;.
  11. . Legal Aid Society of Northeastern New York. The Differences between Federal, State, and Local Laws [Internet]. Legal Help . 2025;.
  12. . CDC. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) | Public Health Law | CDC [Internet] Public Health Law. . 2025;.
  13. . Justia. Nursing Malpractice Law | Medical Malpractice Legal Center [Internet]. Justia. Justia. 2025;.
  14. . American Medical Association . AMA Code of Medical Ethics . 2022;.
  15. . American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys. What is Malpractice? [Internet] . 2025;.
  16. Moore GP, Pfaff JA et al. Malpractice cases in wound care and a legal concept: special defense. The western journal of emergency medicine. 2008;volume 9(4):238-9.
  17. . Connecticut Judicial Branch. Connecticut Judicial Branch Self - Represented Parties Information Series Defendant’s Filing of an Answer to a Complaint . 2016;.
  18. . Homeland Security. Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Office of Chief Counsel Glynco, Georgia - Legal Training Handbook. . 2025;.
  19. . CMS. Place of Service Code Set [Internet] . 2025;.
  20. Stimson CJ. . Hospital risk management and the U.S. legal system: an introduction to U.S. medical malpractice tort law. In: Merkle W, editor. Risk management in medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. . 2016;.
  21. . American Medical Association. The facts you need to know to address the broken medical liability system . 2025;.
  22. . Medical Liability Claim Frequency Among U.S. Physicians. Guardado. . 2017;.
  23. Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Minami CA, Sohn MW, Pavey ES, Holl JL, Mello MM et al. Relationship Between State Malpractice Environment and Quality of Health Care in the United States. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety. 2017;volume 43(5):241-250.
  24. . Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) . 2015;.
  25. . Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ). 1. Are we ready for this change? | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet] . 2025;.
  26. . Doyle C. Anatomy of a Lawsuit: Legal Pearls for the Wound Care Provider [Internet]. 2021 . 2025;.
  27. . US Department of Health and Human Services. Fraud & Abuse Laws | Office of Inspector General | Government Oversight | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [Internet]. 2025 . 2025;.
  28. James R. Ravitz; Naomi J. L. Halpern; & Rachel Hold-Weiss. . Wound Care Practitioners Must Pay Attention to Fraud & Abuse Laws. Today’s Wound Clinic. . 2017;.
  29. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Yoon C, Puopolo AL, Brennan TA et al. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;volume 354(19):2024-33.
  30. Naomi J.L. Halpern & James R. Ravitz. . Malpractice Liability Considerations for Wound Clinics. Today’s Wound Clinic. . 2017;.
  31. . Wound Care Program Director, Corum LA. Malpractice cases in wound care. JIMH . 2023;volume 2(1):.
  32. . Cross H. EP 115: The Legal Side of WOC Care: Nursing Documentation Insights - WOCN [Internet] . 2025;.
  33. . Justia. Amputations Leading to Medical Malpractice Lawsuits | Medical Malpractice Legal Center [Internet]. 2024 . 2025;.
  34. NCSBN. About U.S. Nursing Regulatory Bodies .;.
  35. . National Alliance of Wound Care and Ostomy® (NAWCO®). WCC Candidate Examination Handbook. . 2024;.
  36. . Malpractice Insurance: What You Need to Know. Journal of oncology practice. 2007;volume 3(5):274-277.
  37. . Local Coverage Determination (LCD) L37166 For services performed on or after 7/23/2020 .;.
  38. Pfaff JA, Moore GP et al. Reducing risk in emergency department wound management. Emergency medicine clinics of North America. 2007;volume 25(1):189-201.
  39. Huntington B, Kuhn N et al. Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). 2003;volume 16(2):157-61; discussion 161.
  40. . The Joint Commission. Quick Safety 21: Informed consent: More than getting a signature [Internet]. The Joint Commission. 2022 . 2025;.
  41. Bhat L, McCammon C et al. The Importance of Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Settings. Current bladder dysfunction reports. 2021;volume 16(1):1-5.
  42. . AAPC. What Is Medical Auditing? [Internet] . 2025;.
Topic 2985 Version 1.0

RELATED TOPICS

Guidance on lean staffing for wound care centers. Identification of variables that impact staffing, staffing tool and tips

This topic provides an update on Quality in wound care and how clinical decision support systems like WoundReference can help clinicians achieve better outcomes more efficiently. The topic lists resources such as a quality framework intended to be used for creation or assessment of wound care services, algorithms demonstrating application of evidence in product selection, quality measures specific to wound care, and guidance for wound and hyperbaric programs to successfully navigate the CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS).

This is a collection of posters presented by WoundReference at wound care and hyperbaric medicine conferences. Posters illustrate clinical and practice improvement studies conducted by WoundReference and partnering institutions. Sign up for a Free Basic Account or sign in to view and download WoundReference Posters. 

Guidance on strategic planning and performance improvement tailored to wound care and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) programs is still scarce. This topic provides an Editable Balanced Scorecard Tool with sample metrics for wound care and HBOT programs. Institutions can make a copy of the tool, and use it to select and monitor their own objectives and metrics, according to their own vision and mission.

ABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONOverviewasdBackground DefinitionsMedical ethics: medical ethics applies moral principles to the solving of dilemmas A

5/2/2025 4:15:34 PM
t
-->